44 BAGGAGE July | August 2026 AirportImprovement.com BWI The system went live on Oct. 15, 2025, initially with partial inputs, and was subsequently expanded to full operation as additional tie-ins were completed. Testing results demonstrated high reliability and read rates, confirming the system’s performance, reports Cesar Juarez, senior field engineer with VTC. Once the new baggage handling infrastructure was complete and operating, the old spaces for checked bag resolution and inspection were gutted and rebuilt as office space for Southwest. Major Takeaways A key lesson from the project was the critical importance of close collaboration among stakeholders, facilitated by a shared BIM (Building Information Modeling) system and frequent virtual workshops—a practice accelerated by the pandemic. “There really has been great collaboration and coordination among the entire design team and construction contractors,” remarks Bill Allen, VTC project manager, adding that the regular meetings continue as the project wraps up. “The ability to work directly with the various design team discipline leads has allowed for timely, collaborative resolutions throughout the entire project,” states Joe Emery, Studdiford project manager. This collaborative approach enabled the team to resolve clashes and interferences early, resulting in a highly coordinated and efficient installation, reports McConnell. “Having both the design team and the construction team in the same BIM environment was not only beneficial, but crucial for this project, as there was a lot of existing legacy infrastructure that had to be coordinated around or relocated in many instances,” he notes. For example, it proved invaluable to have a clear picture of existing conditions when crews had to relocate a large cable tray cutting through the middle of the system at fairly low elevation. In resolving that and other challenges, the project team delivered a new baggage system with inline screening that can process 3,255 bags per hour—a significant increase over the previous 2,100 bags per hour. “Really what we’ve got is a system that can basically process as many bags as the main lines can deliver,” McConnell says. “There’s not really a throttle within the system.” With growth always in mind, the airport designed and built a system with flexibility, extra square footage and contingency measures built in to accommodate future increases and changes in airline operations. “You want to build something you can expand,” Shank advises. “And this is expandable.” “We were a little bit at the mercy of the column spacing and some of the existing structure,” McConnell relates. “You won’t find a generic column spacing or even overhead height in the space. Everything is unique.” But collaboration within and between the design and construction teams produced preemptive solutions. “Having Clark and Siemens on early, they were able to look at the site and provide some feedback and findings that could be an issue and circumvent those,” he adds. “It had to be a collaboration.” Lessons learned during the airport’s 2011 recapitalization project about the logistics of getting EDS machines in and out of the space proved helpful during this subsequent expansion. “We have some pretty challenging column lines and structural considerations,” McConnell explains. “Ultimately, we found that feeding the machines from the plan south to the plan north gave us the most flexibility.” While the existing system remained operational, the project team focused on installing and testing the new equipment. “When we started to look at how to tie in and integrate the systems, that’s where it got a little bit more difficult,” McConnell recalls. Integration was performed in phases, with induction and sortation tie-ins executed one group at a time, providing operational redundancy and minimizing risk. BILL ALLEN JOE EMERY CESAR JUAREZ
View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.